![]() The author(s) agree that if there is a breach of any of the above representations and warranties that the author(s) will indemnify SSU, including the publisher and editor of Reflections, and hold them harmless.ĥ. G.) That the Manuscript in no way violates any individual’s privacy rights. AUTHOR WARRANTIES: The author(s) represent(s) and warrant(s):Ī.) that the Manuscript is the author's (authors') own work ī.) that the Manuscript has been submitted only to this journal and that it has not been previously published Ĭ.) that the Manuscript contains no libelous or unlawful statements and does not infringe upon the civil rights of others ĭ.) that the author(s) are not infringing upon anyone else’s copyright.Į.) that the author(s) are responsible for any individual or organizational names that are mentioned in the Manuscript, as SSU disclaims responsibility for references to individuals, organizations, facts, and opinions presented by the published author(s) in the Manuscript.į.) That the author(s) have taken care to ensure that the Manuscript does not contain any identifiable information about clients or patients except as pursuant to appropriate permissions and forms of informed consent as provided for in all relevant laws and codes of ethics. READER RE-USES OF MANUSCRIPT: The author(s) acknowledge that registered readers of Reflections and others with access to the Manuscript may use the Manuscript consistent with applicable law including, but not limited to Fair Use under 17 U.S.C. This statement is intended to provide a copyright release for the purposes set forth in this Section 2, and a photocopy of this Publication Agreement may be used when another publisher requires a written release.ģ. AUTHOR RE-USES OF MANUSCRIPT: As a professional courtesy, the author(s) retains the right to reprint the Manuscript again after publication in Reflections, in any work the author(s) is sole author, or in any edited work for which the author(s) is senior editor, though the author(s) is required to cite the Manuscript as a prior publication in “Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping.” No further permission is necessary in writing from SSU, nor will SSU require fees of any kind for this reprinting. COPYRIGHT: If the manuscript you submit to this site (the “Manuscript”) is selected for publication in Reflections, the author(s) of the Manuscript hereby agree to transfer copyright of the Manuscript to Salem State University, including full and exclusive rights to reproduce the Manuscript in all media now known or later developed, including but not limited to electronic databases and microfilm, and in anthologies of any kind.Ģ. Our reflection supports two practice principles for social work practice: learning through human interactions and assessing with positivity.ġ. We focus additional analyses on four contextual environments (people-centered, knowledge-centered, assessment-centered, and community-centered environments) to develop a cross-cultural practice framework. We categorize these exchanges into context recognition, context analysis, and context management. We (the authors) describe and analyze our interactions with residents in the “floating city” of Chong Khneas using a contextual approach. This article is not a first-person narrative but rather a cultural reflection after a study-abroad program in Cambodia that aimed to provide an approach for promoting a deeper appreciation of international social work practice. However, you can still send a message to to have your information removed from here, and your data will be deleted within 5 business days at the latest.Chong Khneas, Cambodia Tonle Sap Lake Contextual Practice Child Welfare Observational Approach International Social Work, Chong Khneas, Cambodia, Tonle Sap Lake, Contextual Practice, Child Welfare, International Social Work Abstract Use to report an inappropriate profile, death, or other conditions that would require the deletion of the relevant profile.ĭata Policy: All data here is taken from Google Scholar and the data reported during registration, and no information that is not made public with the consent of the person is shared here, except for academic purposes. Top % 2: Indicates that the scientist is among the Top 2% Scientists in the specified subject among the scientists in the AD Scientific Index in the World and/or Country. Subject field ranking in world, region, country and university is beta version since subject field 'others' (597.920 scientists profile whose branch cannot be determined, not yet edited or determined) is excluded, so the ranking will change as the others fields are edited. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |